app/soc/models/question.py
changeset 513 3c1e16637ad7
parent 512 aae25d2b4464
child 533 ba3309b2fd30
--- a/app/soc/models/question.py	Thu Nov 20 18:50:30 2008 +0000
+++ b/app/soc/models/question.py	Thu Nov 20 19:43:31 2008 +0000
@@ -44,12 +44,12 @@
     work.reviews:  even Questions can be "reviewed" (possibly commented
       on during creation or annotated once put into use).
 
-    work.partial_path:  used to scope (and, when combined with
+    work.scope_path:  used to scope (and, when combined with
       work.link_id, uniquely identify) a Question in the same way the
       property are used with Documents, etc.
 
     work.link_id:  used to identify (and, when combined with
-      work.partial_path, *uniquely* identify) a Question in the same way
+      work.scope_path, *uniquely* identify) a Question in the same way
       these properties are used with Documents, etc.
       
     work.content:  the Question text, asked to the respondent
@@ -86,10 +86,10 @@
     when these ideas are implemented in the views and controllers; they
     are here now so that the concepts will not be lost before that time.
 
-  The recommended use for the combination of work.partial_path and
+  The recommended use for the combination of work.scope_path and
   work.link_id is to keep the *same* link_id when copying and
   modifying an existing Question for a new Program (or instance of a
-  Group that is per-Program), while changing the work.partial_path to
+  Group that is per-Program), while changing the work.scope_path to
   represent the Program and Group "ownership" of the Question.  For
   example, if a Question asking about prior GSoC participation needed
   to have an additional choice (see the choice_ids and choices properties
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
     Question:google/ghop2009/gsoc_past_participation
   To get the combined results, query on a link_id of
   gsoc_past_participation.  For more targeted results, include the
-  partial_path to make the query more specific.
+  scope_path to make the query more specific.
 
   Question creation to permit use cases like the one above is going to
   be a bit of an "advanced" skill, possibly.  "Doing it wrong" the first