--- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/feedback/utils.py Thu Apr 15 14:15:44 2010 +0530
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+""" A collection of utilities for feedback app.
+"""
+
+from workshop.feedback.models import *
+
+LONG_FIELD_NAME = {'topics': "Range of topics covered:",
+ 'depth': "Depth of coverage:",
+ 'methodology': "Effectiveness of methodology:",
+ 'pace': "Pace of coverage:",
+ 'applicability': "Applicability:",
+ 'problems': "Choice of problems:",
+ 'exercises': "Choice of Exercises:",
+ }
+
+EXPAND_OPTION = {
+ "topics" : {
+ "1" : "%s%% of the people felt that the range of topics covered was very relevant",
+ "2" : "%s%% of the people felt that the range of topics covered was relevant",
+ "3" : "%s%% of the people felt that the range of topics covered was somewhat relevant",
+ "4" : "%s%% of the people felt that the range of topics covered was not relevant",
+ },
+
+ "depth" : {
+ "1" : "%s%% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was too detailed",
+ "2" : "%s%% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was detailed",
+ "3" : "%s%% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was not detailed enough",
+ "4" : "%s%% of the people felt that the depth of coverage was poorly detailed",
+ },
+
+ "methodology" : {
+ "1" : "%s%% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was extremely effective",
+ "2" : "%s%% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was effective",
+ "3" : "%s%% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was not very effective",
+ "4" : "%s%% of the people felt that the teaching methodology was ineffective",
+ },
+
+ "pace" : {
+ "1" : "%s%% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was too fast",
+ "2" : "%s%% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was fast",
+ "3" : "%s%% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was just right",
+ "4" : "%s%% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was slow",
+ "5" : "%s%% of the people felt that the the pace of coverage was too slow",
+ },
+
+ "applicability" : {
+ "1" : "%s%% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt immediately",
+ "2" : "%s%% of the people felt that they can apply what they have learnt somewhat immediately",
+ "3" : "%s%% of the people felt that they cannot apply what they have learnt immediately",
+ "4" : "%s%% of the people felt that they might never apply what they have learnt",
+ },
+
+ "problems" : {
+ "1" : "%s%% of the people felt that the problems were very interesting",
+ "2" : "%s%% of the people felt that the problems were interesting",
+ "3" : "%s%% of the people felt that the problems were somewhat interesting",
+ "4" : "%s%% of the people felt that the problems were not interesting",
+ },
+
+ "exercises" : {
+ "1" : "%s%% of the people felt that the exercises were very instructive",
+ "2" : "%s%% of the people felt that the exercises were instructive",
+ "3" : "%s%% of the people felt that the exercises were somewhat instructive",
+ "4" : "%s%% of the people felt that the exercises were not instructive",
+ },
+}
+
+def make_day_report(feeds):
+ """ take a list of feedback objects and return the percentage of each item in the form of a dict.
+ """
+
+ no_of_feeds = feeds.count()
+ if not no_of_feeds:
+ return {}
+
+ day_report = []
+
+ for field in ['topics', 'depth', 'methodology', 'pace', 'applicability', 'problems', 'exercises']:
+
+ choices = eval((field+'_choices').upper()) ## the choices are named accordingly in the models file
+ choices_dict = dict(choices)
+
+ field_report = []
+ for option in sorted(choices_dict.keys()):
+ args_dict = {field : option}
+ option_percent = feeds.filter(**args_dict).count() / no_of_feeds * 100
+ if option_percent:
+ field_report.append((EXPAND_OPTION[field][option])%option_percent)
+
+ if field_report:
+ day_report.extend( [LONG_FIELD_NAME[field], field_report] )
+
+ return day_report
+
+